Poole
Drug Action Team
Adult drug treatment plan 2004/05
Part 1: Strategic summary
|
This strategic summary and attached planning grids have been approved by the DAT and are submitted as our collective action plan responding to the needs of people with substance misuse problems in the DAT area. |
|
|
Signature |
Signature |
|
Chair, NAME DAT (on behalf of the Partnership) |
Chair, Joint Commissioning Group |
1 Strategic summary
|
|
|
1.2 What will the DAT commission in 2004/5 and beyond to meet these needs? |
|
|
1.3 What progress has been made to date? |
|
|
1.4 What are the DAT’s top treatment priorities for 2004/05? |
|
2. Building treatment capacity
The national target is to increase the participation of problem drug users in drug treatment programmes by 55% from 1998/99 by 31 March 2004 and by 100% by 31 March 2008, increasing year-on-year the proportion successfully sustaining or completing treatment.
2.1 Numbers in treatment NB All figures for 2003/04 are accurate to end of February 2004
How many drug users have had structured treatment to date/planned for future years?
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
2005/06 |
|
Total number in treatment |
338 |
359 to end of Feb |
480 (Dec 03 – March 05) 360 forecast |
360 |
|
% change over previous year ( year ending 31/3/02-109) |
310% |
+6% |
+5.5% |
0% |
NB The DAT has already achieved the required % increase in participation from the baseline figure and will seek to ensure a year on year increase in numbers sustaining or completing treatment.
How many treatment places has the DAT commissioned to date and plan to commission in future years?
|
Treatment modalities |
Treatment places |
|||
|
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/05 |
2005/06 |
|
|
In-patient treatment |
10 |
15 |
42 |
42 |
|
Residential rehabilitation |
15 |
17 |
15 |
15 |
|
Specialist prescribing |
338 |
359 |
480 (Dec 03 – March 05) 360 forecast |
360 |
|
GP prescribing |
0 |
0 |
25 |
30 |
|
Structured day programmes |
17 |
17 |
36 |
36 |
|
Structured counselling |
32 |
56 |
70 |
70 |
|
Totals |
412 |
457 |
548 |
553 |
What percentage targets has the DAT set for successful completions (i.e. planned discharges), within each treatment modality?
|
Treatment modalities |
Completions |
||||||
|
2002/03 |
03/04 |
03/04 % target |
04/05 |
04/05 % target |
05/06
|
05/06 % target **** |
|
|
In-patient treatment |
10 |
15 |
60% |
38 |
70% |
38 |
70% |
|
Residential rehabilitation |
9 |
10 |
60% |
9 |
70% |
9 |
70% |
|
Specialist prescribing |
40*** |
22 |
25% |
44*** |
30% |
44*** |
30% |
|
GP prescribing |
0 |
0 |
- |
2 |
- |
3** |
- |
|
Structured day programmes |
12 |
9 |
30% |
12 |
35% |
19 |
35% |
|
Structured counselling |
17 |
29* |
60% |
55 |
70% |
55 |
70% |
|
Totals |
88 |
85 |
|
160 |
|
168 |
|
*10 ongoing but stable
** Difficult to predict as this will be a new service provision in 2004/05
*** subutex prescribing available. Discontinued by DHCT in 03/04 but to be reinstated as per new service specs in 04/05. LPSA target are higher but includes those ‘successfully sustained’ in treatment
**** no increased capacity within service provider
2.4 GP shared care
The national target is to increase the numbers of GPs participating in the shared care of drug users to 30%. Please set out the progress that is being made locally and future plans.
|
Year |
2001/02 |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/05 |
2005/06 |
|
Total number of GPs in DAT |
99 |
101 |
102 |
102 (21 practices) |
102(21 practices) |
|
% engaged in shared care |
- |
- |
- |
5 practices = 24.% |
6 practices = 30% |
3. Harm reduction initiatives
Government has set targets since 1998 for the reduction of reported injecting drug use and paraphernalia sharing, and increases in the numbers of such drug users who have been vaccinated against hepatitis B.
For prevalence of injecting and sharing, please use data collected via the service level agreements in the DAT area
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
% drug users injecting |
75-80% |
75-80% |
70-75% |
|
% drug users sharing |
45-50% |
45-50% |
35-40% |
These figures are based on clients of Poole Addictions Community Team although national data suggest only 40-50% injecting drug use. These figures are based only on clients in contact with the specialist service and Community Pharmacy needle exchange as no accurate recording takes place in relation to shared use. Work will take place this year through the Drugs audit, the new Pharmacy needle exchange contract and the harm minimisation clinic to provide a more accurate picture of use. It will then be possible to measure numbers injecting/sharing and establish areas of work to address need. The high number of users injecting also reflects the increase in clients accessing needle exchange provision.
3.2 Blood-borne virus control
What are the DAT’s targets for numbers of intravenous drug users vaccinated against Hepatitis B?
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
Target number of vaccinations |
0 |
251 |
360 |
Please enter the number of people the DAT provides needle exchange for at centre-based or outreach/mobile drug specialist facilities, to date and intends to provide in future years. This number should be taken from service level agreements.
Additionally, please enter the total number of possible pharmacy outlets in the DAT area and the percentage that are engaged in needle exchange programmes in the DAT area.
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
No attending specialist outlets |
311 per month-* 512* packs per month (average) |
254 per month* (average) 494 packs per month (average) |
254 per month *(average) 494 packs per month (average) |
|
No of pharmacies |
27 |
28 |
28 |
|
% in scheme |
11.10% (3) |
10.70% (3) |
10.70% (3) |
*The Drug Action Team has records of the number of needles provided and the number of payments to pharmacists but figures for clients attending are not normally provided by the service provider. The increased cost of the provision in 2003/04 does not correlate with the reported reduction in the number of clients attending. (please see 3.1 above)
The national target is to reduce the number of drug-related deaths by 20% by 2004.
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
Number of drug-related deaths in DAT area |
2 |
2 |
0 |
NB The recent DRD was a client known to the addictions team who was released form Prison without having the benefit of a GP which prevented immediate prescribing by the specialist team
4. Criminal justice interventions
The Government aims to reduce drug-related offending by using every opportunity in the criminal justice system to identify drug-using offenders and engage and retain them in appropriate drug treatment programmes.
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
Total number of arrests |
4698 |
3402 (to end Dec) |
- |
|
Arrest Referrals |
392 |
567 Sept – Feb (268 Poole residents) |
1726 (870 Poole residents) |
|
Nos. engaged in Tier 2 EAR |
N/a |
30 (11%) |
138 |
|
% referred to Tier 3 & 4 |
N/a |
83 (31%) |
25% |
|
% engaged in Tier 3 & 4 |
N/a |
61 (22.7%) |
10.3% (to achieve 89 in treatment) |
|
Year |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/5 |
|
DTTO Commencements |
7 |
10 |
16 |
|
DTTO Successful completions |
4 |
5 |
12 |
5. Quality
|
Briefly describe how the DAT is ensuring quality in drug treatment services. |
|
What are the longest and average waiting times in each treatment modality in the DAT area for the following periods:
|
Treatment modality |
NTA March 2004 target |
Longest wait 30 June 2003 |
Average wait 30 June 2003 |
Longest wait 30 Sept 2003 |
Average Wait 30 Sept 2003 |
Longest Wait 31 Dec 2003 |
Average Wait 31 Dec 2003 |
|
In-patient treatment |
2 weeks |
13 weeks (65 days) |
8.1 weeks (40.5 days) |
7.5 weeks (37.5 days) |
4.5 weeks (22.5 days) |
10.8 weeks (54 days) |
7.6 weeks (38 days) |
|
Residential rehab |
3 weeks |
1 week |
1 week |
1 week |
1 week |
1 week |
1 week |
|
Specialist prescribing |
3 weeks |
5.84 weeks (29.2 days) |
4.78 weeks (23.9 days) |
9 weeks (45 days) |
6 weeks (30 days) |
5 weeks (25 days) |
3 weeks 15 days) |
|
GP prescribing |
2 weeks |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Structured day care |
3 weeks |
6 weeks |
64weeks |
6 weeks |
4 weeks |
6 weeks |
4 |
|
Structured counselling |
2 weeks |
0.8 weeks (4 days) |
0.6 weeks (3 days) |
0.8 weeks (4 days) |
0.45 weeks (2.25 days) |
0.6 weeks (3 days) |
0.5 weeks (2.5 days) |
Please provide a brief explanation of waiting times that fall outside the required targets and what actions and local targets are being set to address this
In patient detox – Poole has no priority beds and clients are placed on a waiting list for East Dorset. Long waiting times exist for stabilisation prior to detox and clients have been placed in residential treatment to overcome unacceptable waiting times. (New Service specifications due to be implemented in April 2004 will rectify the situation.)
Structured Day Care – As above
Specialist prescribing – During May and June the specialist service was without 5 staff members due to training commitments, maternity and paternity leave, sickness, holidays and staff finding other employment. This led to waiting times above national targets. This situation only existed for a short time and the resumption of normal staffing levels resulted in reduced waiting times.
7. Workforce expansion
The national target is to increase the national workforce establishment by 3000, by 2008.
7.1 Number of staff
|
Staff group |
Staffing establishment at 31/12/03 |
Planned totals nos. by** |
|||
|
Total WTE* |
Temporary |
Vacancies |
March 2005 |
March 2006 |
|
|
Joint commissioning staff |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
|
Service managers |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
|
Nurses |
2 |
3 |
3 |
||
|
Social workers |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
|
Counsellors |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Psychiatrists/doctors |
.27 |
.27 |
.27 |
||
|
GP prescribers (number) |
5 |
6 |
|||
|
GP liaison workers |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
|
Outreach workers |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Criminal justice workers |
2 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
||
|
Psychologists |
.27 |
.27 |
.27 |
||
|
Admin/support staff |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
Occupational therapists |
|||||
|
Complementary therapists |
.* |
* |
|||
|
Others |
2 temp student placements |
||||
*Staff trained to deliver complementary therapies and others purchased on a sessional basis
**2005/06 Funding unlikely to be available to increase staff levels
7.2 Ethnic Monitoring
|
For all staff please indicate how many are: |
Practitioners |
Managers |
Commissioners |
|
Asian or Asian British (Bangladeshi) |
|||
|
Asian or Asian British (Indian) |
|||
|
Asan or Asian British (Pakistani) |
|||
|
Asian (Other) |
|||
|
Black of Black British (African) |
|||
|
Black or Black British (Caribbean) |
|||
|
Black (Other) |
|||
|
Chinese |
|||
|
Mixed White and Black African |
1 |
||
|
Mixed White and Black Caribbean |
|||
|
Mixed White and Asian |
|||
|
Mixed Other |
|||
|
White British |
12 |
1 |
1 |
|
White Irish |
|||
|
White other |
|||
|
Other ethnic background |
|||
|
Not Stated |
|||
|
Total |
13 |
1 |
1 |
8. Funding
Please detail all funding available to the joint commissioning group to support delivery of the DAT treatment plan.
|
Funding source |
Amount in 2003/04 |
Amount in 2004/05 |
Amount in 2005/06 |
|
NTA Pooled Treatment Budget (PTB) |
410,000 |
410,000 |
433,000 |
|
NTA PTB underspend carried forward from previous year |
198,000 |
150,000 (accommodation) |
nil |
|
HO arrest referral |
31,857 |
31,857 |
31,857 |
|
Police (inc. ARS) |
9,540 |
11,040 |
11,260 |
|
CJIP (if applicable) |
N/a |
N/a |
N/a |
|
HO after/throughcare |
35,000 |
70,826 |
70,826 |
|
PCT mainstream |
330,000** |
382,450** |
366,639** |
|
Social services |
238,000 *additional allocation of £30,000 made mid year to support shortfall in residential budget |
282,566 +plus provision of Poole Addictions Community Team accommodation running costs |
288,217 |
|
Probation (inc. DTTO)* |
Funding not available to the JCG |
Funding not available to the JCG |
Funding not available to the JCG |
|
Supporting people* not included In treatment Plan as no funding received or finalised for 2004/05 |
0000 |
42,000 |
42,000 |
|
Other: (please specify) |
|
|
|
|
BSc |
61,000 |
65,662 |
67,301 |
|
Drug Action Team/CAD |
31,000 |
30,000 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in 2003/04 |
Amount in 2004/5 |
Amount in 2005/06 |
|
Total funding |
1,344,397 |
1,434,401 |
1,269,100 |
|
Young people’s PTB |
41,000 |
54,481 |
56,375 |
|
Total: Adult treatment |
1,303,397 |
1,379,920 |
1,212,725 |
|
Has the DAT created a pooled budget for drug treatment, fully available to the joint commissioning group? |
YES / |
DATs in receipt of the NTA pooled treatment budget since 2001 must maintain mainstream investments, including inflation uprating, which is subject to audit checking. Lead PCT directors of finance will be required to verify this through the local delivery plan (LDP) reporting process.
|
Have all mainstream funding commitments been maintained and inflation uplifted?* |
YES |
*If the answer is NO, please supply a written explanation as an appendix to this strategic summary.
**
There is still no agreement to the level of mainstream funding used by S&E Dorset PCT to commission Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust. The Drug Action Team is still not able to commission services in its area from this funding which is meant to provide treatment services for Poole
Poole
Drug Action Team
Adult drug treatment plan 2004/05
Part 2: Self-assessment checklist
Submitted to NTA: 19 March 2004
Introduction
Part 2 of the drug treatment plan (Self-assessment checklist) should be completed in accordance with section two of the corresponding guidance.
This self-assessment checklist replaces the gap analysis in last year’s treatment plan.
The criteria for self-assessment is summarised below:
|
RED |
Not in place or not at standard required and significant need/improvements identified |
|
AMBER |
Progress being made but further work/investment required to meet identified need/standard |
|
GREEN |
Provision in place and/or good progress being made against assessed need and required standards |
|
N/A |
Provision/service not needed because no need identified in DAT area |
Tier 1 consists of services offered by a wide range of professionals (e.g. primary care medical services, generic social workers, teachers, community pharmacists, probation officers, housing officers, homeless persons units). Tier 1 services work with a wide range of clients including drug users, but their sole purpose is not simply substance misuse
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Drug services have procedures to refer into all tier 1 services |
AMBER |
|
Basic drug awareness training for staff in: |
|
|
Primary care practices |
AMBER |
|
Community pharmacies |
GREEN |
|
General medical/surgical services |
AMBER |
|
Maternity services |
AMBER |
|
General psychiatry |
AMBER |
|
A&E services |
AMBER |
|
Communicable disease services |
AMBER |
|
Housing services |
GREEN |
|
Vocational services |
AMBER |
|
Social services |
GREEN |
|
Education services |
GREEN |
|
Police |
AMBER |
|
Probation service |
AMBER |
|
Prisons within the DAT area |
AMBER |
NB The Drug Action Team has a programme of free training (now being linked to DANOS) available to each of these agencies. However, not all services choose to access the provision despite strenuous efforts on the part of the Drug Action Team
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards (Tier 1 cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Screening, assessment and referral procedures to drug treatment services in place for staff to follow: |
|
|
Primary care practices |
AMBER |
|
Community pharmacies |
AMBER |
|
General medical/surgical services |
AMBER |
|
Maternity services |
AMBER |
|
General psychiatry |
AMBER |
|
A&E services |
AMBER |
|
Communicable disease services |
AMBER |
|
Housing services |
GREEN |
|
Vocational services |
AMBER |
|
Social services |
GREEN |
|
Education services |
GREEN |
|
Police |
AMBER |
|
Probation service |
GREEN |
|
All agencies working with young people ie connexions,YOT |
GREEN |
|
Progress to Work/ Jobcentre staff |
GREEN |
|
Prisons within DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
RED |
|
Supported housing and other housing available for drug users |
GREEN |
|
Progress2Work and other education, employment and training services available for drug users |
GREEN |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of Tier 1 services, provision and standards |
AMBER |
Services within this tier aim to provide accessible services for a wide range of substance misusers referred from a variety of sources, including self-referrals. The aim of the treatment in this tier is to help substance misusers to engage in treatment without necessarily requiring a high level of commitment to more structured programmes or a complex or lengthy assessment process. Services in this tier include needle exchange programmes and other harm reduction measures, substance misuse advice and information services and ad hoc support not delivered in a structured programme of care.
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Community care assessment |
GREEN |
|
Care co-ordination arrangements for all four tiers, including integrated criminal justice referral pathways |
AMBER |
|
Screening and assessment protocols from Tier 2 to Tiers 3 and 4 |
GREEN |
|
Open access advice and information service including motivational and brief interventions |
GREEN |
|
Pharmacy, centre based, and, if appropriate, outreach needle exchange with full range of harm minimisation equipment and information |
AMBER |
|
Outreach services (detached, peripatetic and domiciliary ) targeting high risk and priority groups |
AMBER |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
RED |
|
Low threshold prescribing |
GREEN |
|
Programme of overdose training supported by overdose agreements |
RED |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of Tier 2 services, provision and standards |
AMBER |
This Tier can be defined as providing services solely for substance misusers in a structured programme of care. Services within this Tier include therapeutic interventions (e.g. CBT, MET), structured methadone maintenance programmes, community detoxification, or structured day care (either provided as a drug-free programme or as an adjunct to methadone treatment). Structured community-based aftercare programmes for individuals leaving prisons are also included in Tier 3.
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Specialist prescribing |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Adequate prescribing capacity and target numbers in treatment |
GREEN |
|
Waiting times target of 3 weeks achieved or bettered |
GREEN |
|
Prescribing options available in line with Models of Care |
AMBER |
|
Published clinical governance arrangements |
RED |
|
Adherence to clinical guidelines evidenced |
AMBER |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
AMBER |
|
GP prescribing |
|
|
More than 30% of GPs in shared care |
RED |
|
Training given to all GPs participating in shared care and all other GPs on request |
RED |
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
RED |
|
Adequate prescribing capacity and target numbers in treatment |
RED |
|
Waiting times target of 2 weeks achieved or bettered |
RED |
|
Prescribing options available in line with Models of Care |
RED |
|
Published clinical governance arrangements as part of Shared Care Monitoring Group protocol |
RED |
|
Adherence to clinical guidelines evidenced |
RED |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
RED |
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards (Tier 3 cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Structured day care |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Waiting times target of 3 weeks achieved or bettered |
GREEN |
|
Abstinence and harm reduction services available |
GREEN |
|
Service has clearly defined evidence based programme and criteria for client preparation, retention, completion and aftercare |
GREEN |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
AMBER |
|
Structured counselling |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Waiting times target of 2 weeks achieved or bettered |
GREEN |
|
Range of structured, care planned counselling and therapies |
GREEN |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
AMBER |
|
Aftercare/throughcare |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Access for all users post all structured treatment interventions |
GREEN |
|
Access for all users on release from custody |
GREEN |
|
Liaison services |
|
|
Acute medical and psychiatric services for pregnant drug users |
GREEN |
|
Acute medical and psychiatric services for drug users with mental health problems |
GREEN |
|
Social services, including child protection and family services |
GREEN |
|
Social care including housing and homelessness |
AMBER |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of Tier 3 services, provision and standards |
GREEN |
Services in this tier are aimed at those individuals with a high level of presenting need and include inpatient drug treatment, detoxification and residential rehabilitation. Tier 4a services usually require a higher level of motivation and commitment from the substance misuser than for services in lower tiers. This tier also covers supported housing.
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Inpatient treatment |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Waiting times target of 2 weeks achieved or bettered |
GREEN |
|
Discharge and throughcare/aftercare planning |
GREEN |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
AMBER |
|
Residential rehabilitation |
|
|
Access for users from all parts of the DAT area |
GREEN |
|
Waiting times target of 3 weeks achieved or bettered |
GREEN |
|
Range of choice available |
GREEN |
|
Discharge and throughcare/aftercare planning |
GREEN |
|
Prevention, screening, testing, immunisation and treatment services for blood borne viruses |
AMBER |
|
Accommodation funded through Supporting People for drug users |
RED |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of Tier 4 services, provision and standards |
GREEN |
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
DAT workforce strategy |
|
|
DAT recruitment and retention strategy across statutory and voluntary sector |
RED |
|
DAT and provider services recruitment policies demonstrate equality of opportunity and plans for increasing percentage of BME workers |
GREEN |
|
Service Level Agreements specify required workforce activities E.g. induction, individual training plans, contingency planning, etc. |
GREEN |
|
Service Level Agreements include funding for training and development of staff within provider services |
GREEN |
|
Human resources policies |
|
|
All agencies and providers compliant with Race Relations Amendment Act |
GREEN |
|
Human resource policies and practice in provider services include staff appraisal, supervision, individual development plans |
GREEN |
|
All drug service job descriptions, person specifications and recruitment processes expressed in line with DANOS |
AMBER |
|
Training and development |
|
|
Training and development strategy and plans across the drug action team and its partner agencies reflect outcomes of NTA/Cranfield training needs analysis and any local training needs analyses |
RED |
|
Provider services working towards creating a supportive learning environment |
GREEN |
|
Training and development plans in provider services reflect NTA/Cranfield training needs analysis and demonstrate how organisational, team and individual needs will be met |
RED |
|
DAT/provider service training plan includes specific focus on how to assess and meet the needs of: clients as parents and clients’ children |
GREEN |
|
Trainee or apprenticeship schemes in provider services |
GREEN |
|
Volunteer development schemes in provider services |
GREEN |
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards (Workforce cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Workforce monitoring |
|
|
NTA workforce monitoring system for providers and commissioners to provide required quarterly returns |
GREEN |
|
Overall assessment of DAT and provider workforce strategy |
GREEN |
This planning grid focuses on the strategic planning process to develop appropriate services for populations who are not fully represented within drug treatment services.
|
Assessment of services, provision and standards |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
DAT diversity policy |
AMBER |
|
Crack cocaine and other stimulant users |
|
|
Prevalence research (nature and extent of drug use) |
AMBER |
|
Needs assessment research re. identifying social and health care needs of crack cocaine and other stimulant users |
AMBER |
|
Service mapping - identifying gaps in service provision (inc. training needs) and regularly reviewed |
AMBER |
|
Black and minority ethnic (BME) drug users |
|
|
Needs assessment research re. identifying social and health care needs of BME drug users |
RED |
|
Service mapping – identifying gaps in service provision (inc. training needs) and regularly reviewed |
RED |
|
Development of Race Equality Scheme (in line with Race Relations Amendment Act) for all partners and providers |
AMBER |
|
Women drug users |
|
|
Needs assessment research re. identifying social and health care needs of women drug users |
AMBER |
|
Service mapping – identifying gaps in service provision (inc. training needs) and regularly reviewed |
AMBER |
|
Rural communities |
|
|
Prevalence research (nature and extent of drug use) in rural communities |
NA |
|
Needs assessment research re. Identifying social and health care needs of drug users in rural communities |
NA |
|
Service mapping - identifying gaps in service provision (inc. geographical access issues, training needs etc.), and regularly reviewed |
NA |
|
Assessment of service, provision and standard (Under-served groups cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Homeless and rough sleepers |
|
|
Needs assessment research re. Identifying social and health care needs of homeless and rough sleepers |
AMBER |
|
Service mapping – identifying gaps in service provision (inc. training needs) and regularly reviewed |
AMBER |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of services, provision and standards to meet needs of under-represented groups |
AMBER |
This planning grid focuses on the implementation of the Models of Care framework, specific areas where DATs should have joint action plans with other partners, together with the full range of commissioning activities, financial and information infrastructure that is required to ensure that there is best value, providing a robust and comprehensive system to support the drug treatment system. It should also cover plans for publication and consultation on the Treatment Plan
|
Assessment of service, provision and standard |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Models of care |
|
|
Implementation group operational on a multi-agency basis with user and carer representation |
GREEN |
|
Audit against Models of care standards and NTA service specifications |
GREEN |
|
Agreed, published screening, referral, triage and assessment protocols |
AMBER |
|
Directory of services including eligibility criteria and full information for users and carers produced and widely available. Process for updates in place. |
GREEN |
|
Information sharing policy between services agreed and published |
AMBER |
|
Integrated care pathway arrangements |
AMBER |
|
Care co-ordination arrangements and documentation |
AMBER |
|
DAT/Partner action plans |
|
|
Waiting times |
|
|
Management and reduction of waiting times |
AMBER |
|
Training in the use of service improvement tools and techniques |
AMBER |
|
Criminal justice |
|
|
Protocol with criminal justice system to maximise the identification, engagement and retention of drug using offenders |
GREEN |
|
Drug-related deaths |
|
|
Action plan on reducing drug related deaths |
RED |
|
Assessment of service, provision and standard (DAT systems and infrastructure – cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Dual diagnosis |
|
|
Joint strategy/action plan for cases of co-morbidity with Mental Health Local Implementation Team |
AMBER |
|
Protocols for the management of drug and alcohol dependence |
|
|
The DAT and the Adult Mental Health Local Implementation Team have agreed and implemented joint protocols for the management of drug & alcohol dependence |
AMBER |
|
Commissioning function |
|
|
Commissioning manager post |
GREEN |
|
Financial and legal advice including robust financial reporting systems |
GREEN |
|
Pooled treatment budget (PTB) management arrangements including carry forward arrangements |
GREEN |
|
Mainstream investments identified and investment being tracked |
AMBER |
|
Minimum uplift by all in line with inflation from all partners funding drug treatment services |
GREEN |
|
Contract management arrangements – including costed service level agreements and performance targets for all mainstream and PTB spend |
GREEN |
|
Framework for quality standards in all services |
GREEN |
|
Terms of reference for joint commissioning group (JCG) agreed with NTA regional manager and in operation |
GREEN |
|
Core membership of JCG from health, probation, police and social services at an appropriate level and fully participating |
GREEN |
|
DAT area targets for treatment PSA for the coming year have been agreed at JCG by all DAT partners |
GREEN |
|
DAT area targets for shared care for the coming year have been agreed at JCG by all DAT partners |
AMBER |
|
DAT area targets for reducing drug related deaths have been agreed at JCG by all DAT partners |
RED |
|
DAT area DTTO targets for the coming year have been agreed at JCG by all DAT partners |
GREEN |
|
Assessment of service, provision and standard (DAT systems and infrastructure – cont) |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Information systems |
|
|
Information system and evidence that information used appropriately to support commissioning decisions |
GREEN |
|
Compliance with NDTMS returns from all providers |
AMBER |
|
Compliance with NTA minimum data set requirements |
AMBER |
|
Web based information system for all providers which can be accessed directly by commissioning manager |
RED |
|
Consultation on, and public access to, treatment plan |
|
|
Consultation undertaken with service providers during year and specifically on preparation/implementation |
GREEN |
|
Consultation undertaken with service users during year and specifically on preparation and implementation |
AMBER |
|
Consultation undertaken with carers during year and specifically on preparation and implementation |
RED |
|
Consultation undertaken with relevant others during the year and specifically on preparation and implementation |
GREEN |
|
Treatment plan in complete and summary form made accessible to the public and local communities (e.g. via web site, local media, libraries and health centres etc) |
GREEN |
|
Overall assessment of DAT systems and infrastructure |
GREEN |
This planning grid focuses on the involvement of users and carers in the design of the local treatment system and their involvement throughout the implementation, monitoring, review and evaluation processes. The grid should cover the development of advocacy services.
|
Assessment of service, provision and standard |
Red/Amber/Green |
|
Action plan tied to DAT treatment strategy and wider service user and carer strategy which includes current, ex and potential service users and carers |
RED |
|
Mentoring, training and development action plan in place, including remuneration for involvement of service users and carers in DAT activities |
AMBER |
|
Network of advocacy and support services which involves, where appropriate, PALS (NHS), local authority and independent sector |
RED |
|
Involvement of service users and carers in DAT structures |
GREEN |
|
Service users and carers involved in setting DAT plan priorities and consulted on plan at draft stage, and throughout the process |
AMBER |
|
Evidence that service user and carer consultation has resulted in action at DAT/provider level |
RED |
|
Overall assessment of coverage and quality of services, provision and standards to meet needs of users and carers |
AMBER |
Poole
Drug Action Team
Adult drug treatment plan 2004/05
Part 3: Planning grids
Submitted to NTA: 19 March 2004
Introduction
Part 3 of the drug treatment plan (Planning grids) should be completed in accordance with section three of the corresponding guidance.
The planning grids remain the same as for last year, other than the gap analysis which is replaced by the self-assessment checklist (part 2).
Planning grid 1: Tier 1 – Non-drug treatment specific services
Tier 1 consists of services offered by a wide range of professionals (e.g. primary care medical services, generic social workers, teachers, community pharmacists, probation officers, housing officers, homeless persons units). Tier 1 services work with a wide range of clients including drug users, but their sole purpose is not simply substance misuse
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Tier 1- Overall assessment –Amber
Comprehensive drug training programme in place and available to all providers/services in the Drug Action Team area although not all agencies accessing the free provision.
Screening, assessment and referral (SAR) procedures not fully developed in line with Models of Care (MoC) across all adult services
No Tier 1 service provision for screening, testing, immunisation and treatment for blood borne viruses
The main gaps in SAR provision centre around general medical services ie GP’s. A&E, psychiatry and a major identified gap exisits in relation to blood borne virus services – the only existing provision is through referral to the GUM clinic in the Bournemouth Drug Action Team area
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Tier 1
1 Young peoples drug screening and referral tool (SUST) developed and implemented. Further work needed to ensure effective use by all agencies
2 Supported accommodation available – continue to work with Housing and Community Services to increase the number of units available
3 Continue to develop and promote the Borough wide drug awareness programme in line with DANOS
4 To work in partnership with Bournemouth and Dorset Drug Action Team’s to develop and implement a consistent screening tool as part of MoC implementation
5 Under the agreed protocol, encourage Poole police custody staff to facilitate increased voluntary drug testing
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/05 – Tier 1
6 Work with PCT to establish funding mechanism and GP referral to Poole Addictions Community Team harm minimisation clinic for testing and immunisation for bloodborne viruses
7 Use ‘one off’ funding to deliver effective training on Hepatitis C to a range of health care professionals
8 Increase the range of training available to pharmacists through joint working with the PCT Pharmaceutical Advisor and the PACT GP liaison Nurse
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £34,500 (Pooled Treatment Budget £18,000) |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/04 £25,019 (Pooled Treatment Budget £0) |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 £5,500 (£4,000 Pooled Treatment Budget) (£1,500 m/s) Total £5,500 |
|
Box 6: No |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Tier 1 |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 |
2.1 Continue to support 5 units of accommodation through Poole Addictions Community Team (PACT) and Poole Aftercare Service (PACS) (Supporting People funding)
4.1 In partnership with Bournemouth and Dorset Drug Action Team’s continue to develop clear local guidelines and screening and referral mechanisms for all Tier 1 Services
5.1 Through the Pan Dorset Criminal Justice steering Group, engage with Police to encourage increased drug testing in Poole Custody Suite
6.1 In partnership with the PCT, develop a mechanism for providing funding to enable GP’s to refer drug using patients to the PACT Harm minimisation clinic for testing and vaccination for blood borne viruses (See grid 3-10.1)
7.1 Deliver Pan Dorset Hep C awareness training to GP’s and other healthcare professionals and circulate advice and information leaflets in the wider public domain
8.1Agree a new and comprehensive pharmacy training programme to include basic drug awareness, screening and assessment, harm minimisation information etc (sponsorship to be sought whenever possible) |
Quarterly returns – January, April ,July and September 2004 As above
Ongoing
July 2004
March 2005
March 2005
February 2004
April 2004
July 2004
March 2004
Ongoing through 2004/05 |
All agencies working with young people
Relevant member of YP sub group
PACT/PACS
DAT/Housing Services
DATs funded/delivered by EDDAAS
Adult Social Services
Moc lead/3 DATs
Police partnership and diversity development superintendent
Poole PCT
Dorset,Bournemouth and Poole DATs
PCT pharmaceutical advisor/PACT GP liaison nurse |
Zero cost
Zero cost
See Grid 3:4.5/6.1
Funding already in place
£20,000 Funded from DAT/CAD and BSC 2003/04 funding £2,500 Funded from DAT/CAD and BSC 2003/04 funding
See Grid 7
£3,500 (£2,000 PTB/£1’500 Police)
See Grid 3: 10.1
£7558 County wide = £2519 ‘one off’ funding 2003
£2000 PTB *9.1 |
|
Total cost Box 10: |
£5,500 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Tier 1 Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c: Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
Planning grid 2: Tier 2 - Open access services
Services within this tier aim to provide accessible services for a wide range of substance misusers referred from a variety of sources, including self-referrals. The aim of the treatment in this tier is to help substance misusers to engage in treatment without necessarily requiring a high level of commitment to more structured programmes or a complex or lengthy assessment process. Services in this tier include needle exchange programmes and other harm reduction measures, substance misuse advice and information services and ad hoc support not delivered in a structured programme of care.
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Tier 2 Overall assessment – Amber
Overall the assessment shows good progress towards ‘Green’ for Tier 2 services. Good screening and referral mechanisms exist between teir 2 and tier 3 services in Poole, the newly established enhanced Arrest Referral Scheme is working well and a new harm reduction service is planned by PACT as soon as its new premises are available. Historic contractual obligations inherited by the Drug Action Team only provide Pharmacy needle exchange from 3 locations but plans for the re tendering of the contract and close working with the PCT is intended to increase provision.
As with tier 1, services for tackling blood borne viruses have been identified as a gap in provision and difficulties have been experienced in commissioning overdose training.
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Tier 2
1 Community Pharmacy Needle Exchange service specification revised.
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/05 – Tier 2
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £195,643 (£77,875 Pooled Treatment Budget) |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/04 £211,791 (£68,800 Pooled Treatment Budget) |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 £56,341 m/s £41,397 EARS £159,794 (PTB) £70,826 (CJIP) TOTAL £328,358 |
|
Box 6: No |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 |
2.1 Following access to new PACT accommodation, deliver weekly harm minimisation clinics to include needle exchange, health screening, blood borne virus service, overdose prevention training and first aid
2.2 Meet the recurrent cost of the PACT harm minimisation ‘E’ Grade nurse (Clinical governance provided by PACT G Grade nurse) Capacity to carry a caseload of up to 25.
3.1 Commission Dorset Ambulance Trust as training provider to deliver programme of overdose prevention training
4.1 Continue to provide advice and information literature promoting local service provision, including revised service directory, to professionals, service users and the wider public
5.1 Meet recurrent core funding for East Dorset Drug and Alcohol Advice Service (EDDAAS) to include 2% inflationary uplift
5.2 Meet recurrent funding for EDDAAS adult outreach provision plus I inflationary increase of 2.5%
5.3 Meet recurrent funding for South Wessex Addiction Centre (SWAC) plus inflationary increase of 2.5%
6.1 Meet recurrent cost of Enhanced Arrest Referral Scheme (to include 1 f/t ‘E’ Grade nurse (clinical governance provided by PACT G Grade nurse) Management, IT and administration costs) integrated within PACT. NB This new service provision ensures priority referral to treatment through Poole Addictions Community Team, provides the opportunity for engaging users with limited motivation and establishes immediate links to be established with the prison liaison worker. The three Dorset schemes are monitored to ensure consistency through the Pan Dorset Criminal Justice steering Group
7.1 To work with Bournemouth and Dorset DATs and service providersto develop effective care co-ordination in line with models of care. As an interim measure agencies will be required to provide ‘in house’ care co-ordination which may lead to a reduction in service provision due to new service delivery from within existing resources. The DATs will seek funding to develop a dedicated care co ordination service for clients whose needs cross several areas and who require co-ordination of care on behalf of each of the services and agencies involved It is estimated that each worker could case carry 25 clients and that a minimum of three workers (suitably trained) would be required to meet the needs of Poole Addictions Community Team clients with complex needs NB In recognition of financial constraints work is in progress to link the care co-ordination role of the specialist service with an advocacy/mentoring role provided by the Service User forum
|
August 2003
December 2003
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
June 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
March 2005
June 2004
Ongoing
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
December 2003-March 2004 April 2004
April 2004
April -September 2004 ( Interim)
October 2004
January 2004 |
DAT Co-ordinator
Bournemouth JCO
Pan Dorset Commissioners
N/E working Group
N/E working Group
PACT harm minimisation nurse
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT/CDRP
DAT JCO
DAT Co-ordinator
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
DAT JCO
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DATs JCOs
PACT Practice Manager
DAT Joint Commissioning Officer
Faithworks (Poole) |
Zero cost
Not known (PTB)(£20,000)
Not known (PTB)(£12,000?)
£1000 (PTB)
See below
£24,000 (PTB)
£19,218 (PTB) ( The figure below has been used instead in the calculation of total spend)£24,000 (PTB)
£15,000 (PTB)
£15,120 (PTB) *9.2
Zero cost
£2,200 (M/S)
£2,500 PTB *9.3
£33,393 M/S £8,160 M/S £7,462 (PTB)
£10,965 (PTB)
£1,088 M/S £1,122 (PTB) ( See Grid 3:7.2)£41,397 (Police and Home office funding) £5,000 m/s
£10,000 (CJIP)
£15,000 (CJIP)
£35,000 (CJIP 2003) Fund new service provision for 2004/05 -£35,540
£10,286 CJIP £6,500 M/S
Zero cost
3 X £17,750 per annum = half year cost of £26,625 (PTB) * 9.5
£ 20,000 DAT/CAD 2003/04 funding£4,000 Routes to Roots |
|
Total costs Box 10: |
£328,358 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Tier 2 Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11 c: Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
Planning grid 3: Tier 3 - Structured community-based services
This Tier can be defined as providing services solely for substance misusers in a structured programme of care. Services within this Tier include structured cognitive behaviour therapy programmes, structured methadone maintenance programmes, community detoxification, or structured day care (either provided as a drug-free programme or as an adjunct to methadone treatment). Structured community-based aftercare programmes for individuals leaving prisons are also included in Tier 3.
Box 1: Summary of self assessment – Tier 3 Overall assessment- Green
The two priority areas for improvement in 2004/05 are GP Prescribing and Blood borne Virus services. Despite efforts by the DAT and the PCT Poole still has no formal shared care arrangements.
As a result of inadequate accommodation for PACT there has been very a limited number of clients benefiting form Hepatitis B immunisation through the specialist service, despite this being an identified priority for the DAT.
Clinical Governance can be evidenced within existing service provision but it accepted that a more robust method of monitoring should be established. This has been addressed in part by the development of new service specifications for Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust (DHCT) (the current service provider)
In other areas the continued development of the Poole Addiction Service is achieving effective and diverse service delivery to meet the needs of clients although inadequate accommodation and a fluctuation in staff numbers has had an effect on the capacity of the team
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Tier 3
1Continue to work with Bournemouth and Dorset DATs, supported by the NTA and the S&E Dorset PCT, to identify mainstream spend
2Work with DHCT to deliver services in accordance with new service specifications underpinned by new contractual arrangements
3New premises for PACT identified. Funding to be provided to facilitate the move and ensure the accommodation meets the needs of service users and providers
4Review and consolidate the work of PACT to ensure that it is able to meet the diverse needs of service users in line with Models of Care
5Continue to work with the PCT to engage GPs in Shared Care arrangements
6Work with EDDAAS aftercare project to increase its capacity,
7 Continue to deliver effective treatment provision for clients subject to DTTO’s
8Continue to develop the dedicated Young people s treatment Service - YADAS
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/05 – Tier 3
9Work with service providers and the PCT to ensure robust and effective clinical governance
10Work with PACT, GPs and the PCT to ensure adequate blood borne service provision is in place within the specialist prescribing service
11Work with the Mental Health LIT and the PCT to identify need and ensure dedicated local service provision for clients with dual diagnosis.
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 – Tier 3 £838,060* (£317,560PTB) * Includes estimated Mainstream spend – still to be confirmed |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/4 – Tier 3 £458,283 M/S £385,604 (PTB) Total £843,887 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 – Tier 3 £407,038 m/s £95,662 external funding (BSC/DAT/CAD) £252,624 (PTB) +£150,000c/f TOTAL £905,324 |
|
Box 6: No |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Tier 3 |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 |
2.1New Service Specifications completed and forwarded to DHCT for comment/agreement
2.2 Work with DHCT and locality teams to ensure delivery of service provision in line with new service specifications
2.3 Establish new data collection mechanism and agree data sharing arrangements with DHCT/Poole Addictions Community Team and other providers to enable Drug Action Team to provide statistical reports as required and to inform future service development
3.1 Commission detailed project plans service specification and contract for required work (to include telephones and It equipment)
4.1 Meet the recurrent costs of PACT practice supervisor, senior practitioner and social worker and costs associated with line management (plus 2.5% inflationary uplift)
4.2 Meet the recurrent costs of PACT G Grade nurse (plus 2.5% inflationary uplift). Capacity to carry caseload of no more than 25. Clinical Governance provided by DHCT
GP’s in formal shared care arrangements and to seek the Support of the NTA GP regional representative. (Target 6 GP’ engaged)
which will also be the Shared Care Monitoring Group
7.4 Additional placements to meet increased commencements targets (increase form 11 to 16) (New joint provision to be provided in partnership with PACT and EDDAAS. Work towards mainstream provision for DTTO clients with one to one intensive supports through voluntary agency. Prescribing undertake through mainstream provision)
8.1 Meet recurrent costs (plus 2.5% inflationary uplift) of dedicated young peoples treatment service. Fully integrated service provision providing direct access to treatment through self/GP/parent/professional referral. Range of treatment options available full details of which are in the Young People's Substance Misuse Plan (Cost include full running cost for the service ie premises, management, administration) NB Due to increasing numbers of YP accessing service provision the Treatment and YP sub Groups, ratified by the DAT, recognised and agreed the need for financial support for an effective YO Service provision
9.1 Strengthen links with PCT and service providers to ensure robust clinical governance procedures are in place. Through commissioning monitoring processes ensure that all providers have a ‘critical incident’ policy and that procedures are in place to facilitate verification by the Drug Action Team JCG
10.1 Work with the PCT to identify specific funding to enable GP’s to refer to PACT harm minimisation clinic for blood borne virus testing and immunisation 125 client referrals @ £42 per immunisation
10.2 Work with PCT and Health Protection agency to ensure advice and information literature is widely available
11.1 Establish robust links with the Mental Health LIT to identify level of need for dual diagnosis service provision within Drug Action Team area
11.2 As a result of identification of need, develop a joint action plan between the Drug Action Team and the LIT to set priorities for action together with realistic timescales. |
December 2003
April 2004
December 2003
March 2005
March 2004
December 2003
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
June 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
December 2004
April 2004
Ongoing
April 2004
June 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
June 2004
April 2004
September 2004
December 2004 |
Dorset DATs/NTA/ S&E Dorset PCT
S&E Dorset PCT
S&E Dorset PCT
DHCT/ Dorset DATs
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
Social Services
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
DHCT
DHCT
Practice supervisor
PCT director of service development
PCT director of service development PCT director of service development
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
PCT director of service development
PCT director of service development
PCT director of service development
Mental Health LIT
Mental Health LIT |
Zero cost
£245,583?? (see Grid 4 for inpatient costs)
Zero cost
Costs as apportioned in this Plan See Grid 7:7.1
£150,000 (C/F from 2003/04)
£132,225 M/S
£31,775 (PTB)
£5,000 (PTB)
£27,000 PTB 9.6
£17,950 (BSC)
£19,223 (PTB)
£29,212 (BSC)
£14,000 (PTB)
£3,925 (PTB)
£12,000 (PTB)
See Grid 1-8.1
See planning grid 2
£8,000 (PTB)
£6000 (PTB) £6480 M/S res. Budget
£16,500 M/S (inc @ 1.2)
£4,125 (PTB) *9.7
Zero cost
Zero cost
Zero cost
Zero Cost
£21,320 (PTB)
£10,775 (PTB)
£25,000 (PTB)
£10,000 (PTB)
**£30,000 DAT/CAD to offset PTB and retain school drugs advisor +£18 500 BSC (O/W) + £54,481 (PTB)**Total cost of service £102,981 **
Zero Cost
£5250 M/S(PCT)
£1,000 M/S (PCT)
From within existing resources
From within existing resources |
|
Total costs Box 10 |
£905,324 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Tier 3 Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
|
|
||
Planning Grid 4: Tier 4 (a) – Residential and inpatient services
Services in this tier are aimed at those individuals with a high level of presenting need. Services in this tier include inpatient drug treatment, including detoxification and residential rehabilitation. Tier 4a services usually require a higher level of motivation and commitment from the substance misuser than for services in lower tiers. Objectives and joint action plans with Supporting People should be included in this Grid.
Box 1: Summary of self assessment – Tier 4(a) Overall assessment GREEN
Access to inpatient and residential treatment is generally good. However, gaps in provision have been identified in relation to limited access to DHCT Flaghead Inpatient Unit due to no priority bed allocation for Poole clients. Waiting times for access to residential treatment is within national guidelines however, there has been an acute problem due to lack of resources to fund the placements needed. Both Social Service and the Drug Action Team have provided additional budget in 2003/04 to meet identified need for the most chaotic clients. Clients are offered a choice of provider although there is still a predominance of provision based on the 12-step abstinence model and it is difficult to refer to an alternative provision.
Clients referred by PACT will have had the benefit of Hep B immunisation and harm minimisation advice although there are still inadequate screening and treatment provisions to meet the needs of clients.
‘Dry’ accommodation is available through supporting people but there is no provision for clients in treatment and this has been identified as a priority area for Poole Addictions Community Team clients who would benefit from a dedicated community detoxification service.
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Tier 4(a)
1 Implement new service specification developed for DHCT Flaghead Unit, which will provide direct access for Poole clients, referred through PACT.
2 Maintain regular contract monitoring and evaluation of residential contracts and ensure thorough aftercare/discharge planning
3 Develop existing arrangements for DTTO placements to meet increased targets
4 Work with YADAS and Children and Families Services to commission effective Tier 4 treatment provision for young people
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/5 – Tier 4(a)
5 Increase community care residential budget to meet the increased number of referrals to PACT
|
Box 3: Planned Spend 2003/04 – Tier 4(a) £165,190 (PTB £24,000) |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/4 – Tier 4(a) £36,000 PTB, £80,080 F/h £102,300 M/S £208,300 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 – Tier 4(a) £201,237 m/s £10,000PTB TOTAL £211,237 |
|
Box 6 No. |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Tier 4(a) |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
NB This is the first time Poole will have use of priority bed space and close monitoring will take place during the year to identify an accurate picture of need/capacity to inform future planning.
2.1 In addition to routine contract monitoring, obtain additional feedback from service users in relation to service provision and planned discharge.
2.2. Liaise with residential providers to ensure referral back to PACT, whenever appropriate, in relation to unplanned discharges.
3.1Work with National Probation Service and local treatment providers to increase the number of treatment places available and extend the range of treatment options to limit the need for residential placements.
4.1 Work with the new Young People’s commissioning group and Children and Families Services to ensure access to tier 4 treatment for Poole YADAS clients when necessary
5.1 Commission residential placements for Poole Addictions Community Team clients. Funding will provide approximately 10 x 12 week primary placements and 5 x 12 week secondary placements. Need to be assessed under FAC’s criteria within the local definition of critical.
6.1 Work with PACT and the police to commission appropriate residential treatment provision for clients needing further treatment on release form Prison and for clients identified through the Persistent Offender Scheme with chaotic polydrug use |
March 2005
April 2004
April 2004
Quarterly reports
Quarterly reports
Quarterly reports
As required
As required
Ongoing
|
Pan Dorset JCG
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
YP JCO
DAT JCOs
DAT JCOs
|
Zero cost
£105,417(M/S) subject to increase to include capital cost
zero cost
zero cost
zero cost
See Grid 3 -7.3
To be spot purchased if necessary
£95 820 (+£6480 SDC =102,300)
£10,,000(PTB ) *9.4 |
|
Total cost Box 10 |
£211,237 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Tier 4(a) Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
|
|
||
Planning grid 5: Workforce development
The required expansion and improvement of the treatment sector cannot be achieved without a significant expansion in the workforce, and a step change in the training and professional development of these employees. DATs and service providers will need to implement local workforce initiatives, in addition to the NTA programme, in order to address local recruitment and training needs.
In terms of workforce plans for 2004/5 DATs should particularly note the requirement that all job descriptions and person specifications for staff working within the drug treatment sector should be revised so that roles are expressed in line with the DANOS competency statements by September 2004.
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Workforce Overall Assessment – Green
The Drug Action Team does not have a dedicated recruitment and retention Strategy or a formal training strategy. However, training is a high priority in the local delivery of each area of the National Strategy. Through an amalgamation of funding streams the Drug Action Team has commissioned and expanded drug training across the Borough.
Not all service providers have incorporated DANOS into existing job descriptions as this has been identified as an area for closer scrutiny in terms of changes to existing employee’s contracts of employment. However, all job descriptions are revised in line with DANOS when existing posts are vacated and all new posts have DANOS incorporated.
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – Updated and continuing - Workforce
1 Through the Drug Action Team and the wider merged CDRP/DAT merged partnership, to encourage all agencies to participate in the Boroughwide drug awareness training
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/5 – Workforce
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 – Workforce £1,500 |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/4 – Workforce £700 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 - Workforce From within existing resources |
|
Box 6 No. |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones - Workforce |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4 |
|
April; 2004
Ongoing
Ongoing
December 2003
January 2004
Ongoing
Ongoing
March 2005
Ongoing
Monthly
Monthly |
Merged partnership
External training provider External training provider
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
All providers/monitored by JCO
DATC
DAT JCO
NTA regional reps/DATC DAT JCOs
DAT JCO |
Zero Cost
From within existing resources From within existing resources
£200 DATs/CAD 2003 £500 DATs/CAD 2003
Within existing resources
Within existing resources Cost to be identified
Cost to be identified
Zero Cost
Zero Cost |
|
Total costs Box 10: |
£000 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Workforce Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
|
|
||
Planning grid 6: Under-served groups
This planning grid focuses on the strategic planning process to develop appropriate services for populations who are not fully represented within drug treatment services.
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Under-served groups Overall Assessment - Amber
The Drug Action Team has not commissioned any dedicated work to inform the development of treatment services for BME drug users. However, through work with other agencies, primarily the Dorset Racial Equality Council, it has obtained information on local diversity issues and has developed a mechanism for the sharing and dissemination of information which assists DAT planning. The overall BME population in Poole is very low with Chinese being the largest minority group in Poole. Recent research highlighted that language and unfamiliarity with local service provision was an issue and the DAT has subsequently produced a range of advice and information in three minority ethnic languages and has facilitated access to language line for clients accessing services. Working with a local faith group has identified the need for access to services for the homeless and rough sleepers and a pilot project is underway to address identified problems. Services in contact with Travellers (who form a significant minority group at certain times of the year) need to ensure they provide information and advice on available local services. Dedicated service provision is available for stimulant users and women
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Under-served groups
1 Increase the number of gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and trans gender people accessing service provision
2Continue to provide dedicated stimulant and women’s clinics through PACT
3Through QuADS and regular contract monitoring, ensure that all providers adhere to the race Relations Act
4 Ensure that agencies working with Travellers have training in drug awareness and are able to provide information on, or refer to, appropriate service provisions
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/05 – Under-served groups
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £2,500 |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/4 £3,500 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 £8,790 (PTB) |
|
Box 6 No. |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Under-served groups |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
1.1Continue to work with LAGLO (lesbian and gay liaison officer) to ensure information on service provisions is widely available
1.2A survey of users of Over the Rainbow (a support organisation for the gay community) identified the need for a dedicated drug/alcohol worker to meet the needs of clients who would not access existing services. Support has been sought from the three Dorset DATs for a jointly funded post to meet the identified needs. (E Grade Nurse or suitably qualified Social worker)
2.1 Provide weekly ‘ women only’ clinic ( with childcare provision if required) and provide dedicated women only complimentary therapy sessions with crèche facility (8 treatment places per week)
2.2 Provide weekly stimulant clinic and a range of complimentary therapies for clients
2.3 Liaise with the local GUM clinic to provide a dedicated weekly session in when PACT operate from new premises
3 .1 Monitor data from service providers to establish whether the level of clients by ethnicity remains consistent with local statistical and health ethnicity data.
4.1 Liaise with local agencies and services working with Travellers to ensure that staff have accessed the Borough wide drug awareness training and are able to supply literature, advice and information on referral routes to services.
4.2 Ensure that up to date information and advice on drug relates issues and local service provision is available in the three main ethnic languages
5.1Commission dedicated training on ‘Crack Cocaine’ for all members of Poole Addictions Community Team (18 places available)
5.2Provide one training place for external trainer to facilitate the cascading of Crack training to other providers
6.1 Work with local faith group to develop a pilot project providing outreach services to homeless/ rough sleepers with drug and/or alcohol problems and extend drop in facility to include weekend session. ( See Grid 2 –8.1)
6.2Work with the PCT to identify a GP willing to work with PACT to enable clients to register and enable appropriate prescribing to take place. (NB this is also a problem for many prisoners returning to the community who have no accommodation or GP) |
Ongoing
June 2004
Weekly
Weekly
June 2004
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Ongoing
Ongoing
December 2003
December 2003
See Grid 2
September 2003 |
PACT Harm minimisation nurse
Pan Dorset JCG
PACT
PACT
PACT
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
See Grid 2
PCT Director of Service development |
Zero Cost
Total cost £27,000 x York formula = £4860 or East Dorset formula = £7290 (PTB) *9.8
See Grid 3
See Grid 3
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
£1,500 (PTB) *9.9
£1000 (DAT/CAD 2003) zero cost
See Grid 2
Zero Cost |
Total £8790
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Under-served groups Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
Planning grid 7: Systems and infrastructure
This planning grid should include objectives and action plans in relation to:
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Systems and infrastructure Overall Assessment - Green
In the interest of service providers that work across more than one DAT area, it was agreed that Models of Care would be implemented on a pan Dorset basis. This has resulted in some deadlines not being met although work has started on all target areas. The management of waiting times is broadly within National Targets although fluctuation in staffing levels can have a negative effect. Developments are in progress to ensure that integrated service delivery in relation to the CJS will expand and continue to provide a robust and effective service. Links between the DATs and the Mental Health LIT have been established and work is planned to more fully identify local need and establish a local Dual Diagnosis provision.
Fully developed commissioning arrangements are in place although the DAT has not yet reached agreement with all commissioners to enable full commissioning of all mainstream spend.
Consistent information gathering in electronic format from all providers is an area requiring development and investment. In conjunction with MoC implementation, new systems are being developed to address the data collection requirements on DATs from the NTA, Home Office, DoH, SHA’s and other government agencies in relation to BVPI’s, KPI’s and LPSA targets.
Through existing mechanisms, consultation takes place throughout the year in relation to treatment planning and service delivery.
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – updated and continuing – Systems and infrastructure
1In conjunction with Dorset and Bournemouth DATs, review the existing mechanism for the delivery of MoC and amend as necessary.
2Retain DAT Joint Commissioning Officer in post and maintain effective commissioning arrangements
|
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/5 – Systems and infrastructure |
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £29,970moc,£34,750 |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/04 £33,000, £17,500moc |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 £400 m/s £86,844 Pooled Treatment Budget TOTAL £87,244 |
|
Box 6: No |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Systems and infrastructure |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 |
2.1 Joint Commissioning Officer retained in post and Service Specifications completed for all services commissioned. (DHCT Service Specifications still to be agreed with the Trust)
2.2 Data collection and monitoring system and monitoring system (financial and statistical) to be reviewed in order to best meet emerging requirements for government returns and future treatment planning
2.3 Establish p/t information/administration officer to increase capacity of Drug Action Team Co-ordinator/Joint Commissioning Officer and to be responsible for information sharing within the integrated DAT/CDRP partnership (Gen 3 Post)
2.4 Robust commissioning arrangements maintained with the full participation of all partners to ensure target setting and the delivery of services in line with national and local standards
2.5 Continue to fund Quads through the SW Peer Audit project for a further year but investigate alternative providers for future years
Audit Project
3.1 Local service providers to meet to implement service improvement tool to develop local arrangements for reducing waiting times and improving access to all modalities for PACT clients
4.1 Work through the pan Dorset CJ steering Group to identify needs and gaps in provision in relation to an integrated and consistent system to get drug misusing offenders into treatment, throughcare and aftercare (See Grid 2-6.2 and Grid 3 - 4.8 & 6.2)
5.1 Enter into local arrangement with Coroners office for the supply of copies of all drug related death reports relevant to the Drug Action Team area. This will inform action planning for reducing drug related deaths
7.1 Work with Bournemouth and Dorset DATs to develop and implement an electronic system of data collection for use by all providers which will inform future service planning and provide data for submission as required by the Drug Action Team.
7.2 Work with providers to ensure that appropriate staff are trained and supported in the use of new data collection tools and that information (which meets minimum data set/NDTMS requirements) is passed electronically to the Joint Commission Officer on a monthly basis
|
February 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
April – October 2004
Ongoing
By April 2004
June 2004
Quarterly meetings
December 2004
ongoing
January 2004
Quarterly meetings
Ongoing
January 2003
April 2004
April 2004 – March 2005
April 2004/monthly
Ongoing
June 2004 |
Pan Dorset JCG
MoC lead
MoC lead
DAT JCOs
PACT Practice supervisor
DAT JCO
MoC lead
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DATC/LIT Lead
DATC/LIT Lead
Pan Dorset JCG
DAT JCOs
DATC
Clouds |
Zero cost
From within existing resources
From within existing resources
£8,000 PTB *9.10
Interim zero cost
£15,000 (PTB) *9.11 £10,000 (PTB) york formula = £1,800 (PTB) £30,800 (PTB)
Zero Cost
£17,200 pro rata (to include recruitment costs) 9.12(PTB) Zero Cost
£3,044(PTB) *9.13
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
See Grids 2 &3
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
£10,000 (PTB) *9.14
from within existing resources
£500 (PTB)
£500 (PTB) £400 M/S |
TOTAL £87,244
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Systems and infrastructure Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
Planning grid 8: Users and carers
This planning grid focuses on the involvement of users and carers in the design of the local treatment system and their involvement throughout the implementation, monitoring, review and evaluation processes. The grid should cover the development of advocacy services.
Box 1: Summary of self-assessment – Users and carers overall assessment – Amber
Both user and carer involvement with the Drug Action Team area is in its very early stages. During the past year groups have been established but neither group has yet established a robust mechanism to support full participation in Drug Action Team structures. The new merged CDRP/DAT partnership has also identified areas of concern by some partners in relation to service user representation within the new structure in relation to some Criminal Justice issues.
Financial support from within limited DAT resources does not provide sufficient funding to meet the identified need of both groups although the Drug Action Team makes every effort to provide ‘in kind’ support ie training, room hire, stationary
Box 2a: Objectives from 2003/04 – Updated and continuing – Users and carers
1 Contractual arrangements continue to include monitoring of service user feedback
Box 2b: New objectives for 2004/5 – Users and carers
5 Work with service users and carers to establish meaningful involvement in all Drug Action Team activities
6 Request the NTA to provide regional fora for groups to meet and share best practice, advice and information and to receive training on topics relevant to Drug Action Teams
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £500 |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/04 £700 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05
|
|
Box 6 No. |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Users and carers |
Box 8: By When |
Box 9: By Whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
1.1 All new and existing contracts to specify that evaluation of services by users will be monitored by the Joint Commissioning Officer and the outcomes taken into account in the development of future service provision
1.2 Continue to obtain the views of PACT clients on all areas of local service provision on a regular basis (Positive feed back regularly received and reported to Treatment Sub group – areas of concern relate to PACT accommodation)
2.1 Pilot carer project established and extended. ( Pump priming funding from Social Services Carer Budget and free use of premises secured. Service commissioned at reduced cost.) Continue to promote group on local radio and through advertising in public areas.
2.2 identify alternative accommodation for project and zero cost
2.3 Encourage and facilitate a diverse range of consultation processes with Carers through the group
3.1 The Drug Action Team to agree and formalise arrangements for remuneration paid to service users/cares attending DAT activities. (Out of pocket expenses currently paid)
(PACT accommodation) for Service User Group
5.1 Engage with Service users and carers to seek their views on an effective mechanism for consultation and meaningful involvement in Drug Action Team activities and implement changes accordingly
DATs and established SU Fora.
6.1 Work with the NTA regional deputy managers to establish a mechanism for SW regional fora to support new and established service user and carer groups and to investigate the possibility of regional training events |
Quarterly
Quarterly
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
February 2004
Weekly
Ongoing
Ongoing
June 2004
September 2004
Ongoing
April 2004
June 2004 |
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
DAT JCO/Clouds
DAT JCO/Clouds
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DATJCO
All providers reporting to the JCO GO DT advisors
NTA regional JCO |
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
See Grid 7-8.2
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
See grid 7 8.2
From within existing resources From within existing resource
Zero ost
Zero Cost
Zero Cost
From within existing NTA resources |
|
Total costs Box 10: |
£000 |
|||
|
Box 11a: Quarterly progress report to DAT – Users and carers Quarter 1 2 3 4 (Please circle appropriate quarter) |
||
|
Box 11b: Action point |
Box 11c Progress to date |
Box 11d: Further action |
|
|
||
Planning grid 9: Tier 1 – 4 Priorities for inclusion – subject to the identification of funds
Box 1: Although it is accepted that by the date of final submission, the DAT may be more able to accurately predict available resources for 2004/05 (ie slippage), at the time of drafting the Treatment Plan there are significant concerns regarding its ability to deliver effective services across all tiers from within identified resources.
There are two main areas of concern:
The allocation of a zero growth Poole Treatment Budget; and
The unresolved identification of mainstream spend in relation to service delivery by Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust.
Despite protracted discussions during the past eighteen months between the three Dorset Drug Action Teams and the lead commissioners for substance misuse and intervention and assistance from the National Treatment Agency, limited progress has been made to facilitate commissioning of all mainstream services by the Drug Action Team.
The majority of treatment provision in Poole is dependent on adequately staffed services. A zero growth budget has obviously resulted in difficulties in maintaining current staffing levels due to the need to fund inflationary and incremental salary increases. (Recruitment and retention problems within the DAT area have already been identified as a problem). Additional burdens on limited resources have resulted as a consequence of the development and expansion of services in line with Government and National Treatment Agency requirement ie Models of Care, new data collection requirements requiring investment in IT, improved blood borne virus services and developing service capacity to meet targets for increasing the number of people entering treatment.
The financial difficulties are further compounded by the unresolved mainstream funding issues. Funding is allocated to Dorset Healthcare Trust (which is commissioned by the South and East Dorset PCT as lead commissioner for substance misuse in Dorset) to provide an effective addiction service for Poole. It has been agreed that Poole Drug Action Team should receive an allocation of 27% of the total cost of the DHCT Addiction service. However, by examining planning grids 1-9 of this plan it can be seen that neither proportionate funding or staffing levels are allocated by DHCT to provide an effective service provision for Poole residents. In order to meet national directives and, more importantly, the needs of Poole clients a significant proportion of the Pooled Treatment Budget is allocated to ensure an effective local service.
Whilst it is recognised that a number of funding streams, including new CJIP Finance, have a positive impact on service provision these resources are restricted for "spend" in specific areas and cannot be diverted to meet unmet need generally in relation to service development identified as a priority in Poole. The Drug Action Team has therefore recommended the inclusion of an additional planning grid which identifies the priorities which the DAT is unlikely to be in a position to deliver during the coming financial year until the outstanding mainstream funding issue has been resolved. It must be noted that this may result in cuts in service provision or inadequate development of new provision.
|
Box 3: Planned spend 2003/04 £ |
Box 4: Likely spend 2003/04 |
Box 5: Planned spend 2004/05 £149,404 |
|
Box 6: No |
Box 7: Actions/Milestones – Tier 1 |
Box 8: By when |
Box 9: By whom |
Box 10: Costs |
|
9.1 Grid 1
9.2 Grid 2
9.3 Grid 2
9.4 Grid 4
9.5 Grid 2
9.6 Grid 3
9.7 Grid 3
9.8 Grid 6
9.9 Grid 6
9.10 Grid 7
9.11 Grid 7
9.12 Grid 7
9.13 Grid 7
9.14 Grid 7 |
8.1Agree a new and comprehensive pharmacy training programme to I include basic drug awareness, screening and assessment, harm minimisation information etc
4.1 Continue to provide advice and information literature promoting local service provision, including revised service directory, to professionals, service users and the wider public
6.1Meet the cost of residential placements for CJIP clients
7.1 To work with Bournemouth and Dorset DATs and service providers to develop effective care co-ordination in line with models of care. As an interim measure agencies will be required to provide ‘in house’ care co-ordination which may lead to a reduction in service provision due to new service delivery from within existing resources. The DATs will seek funding to develop a dedicated care co ordination service for clients whose needs cross several areas and who require co-ordination of care on behalf of each of the services and agencies involved It is estimated that each worker could case carry 25 clients and that a minimum of three workers (suitably trained) would be required to meet the needs of Poole Addictions Community Team clients with complex needs
1.2A survey of users of Over the Rainbow (a support organisation for the gay community) identified the need for a dedicated drug/alcohol worker to meet the needs of clients who would not access existing services. Support has been sought from the three Dorset DATs for a jointly funded post to meet the identified needs. (E Grade Nurse or suitably qualified Social worker)
4.2 Ensure that up to date information and advice on drug relates issues and local service provision is available in the three main ethnic languages
1.4 Publish revised service directory to include referral routes and circulate widely to service users and providers
7.1 Work with Bournemouth and Dorset DATs to develop andimplement an electronic system of data collection for use by all providers which will inform future service planning and provide data for submission as required by the Drug Action Team . |
Ongoing through 2004/05
April 2004
Ongoing
April 2004
October 2004
June 2004
December 2004
June 2004
Ongoing
April 2004
April 2004
June 2004
April 2004
April 2004-March 2005 |
PCT pharmaceutical advisor/PACT GP liaison nurse
DAT JCO
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
DAT JCOs
Pan Dorset JCG
DAT JCOs
DAT JCO
DAT JCO
Drug Action Team Co-ordinator
DAT JCOs
Pan Dorset JCG |
£2000 PTB
£15,120 PTB
£2,500 PTB
£10,000 PTB
3 X £17,750 per annum = half year cost of £26,625 (PTB)
£27,000 (PTB)
£4,125 (PTB)
Total cost £27,000 x York formula = £4860 or East Dorset formula = £7290 (PTB)
£1500 (PTB)
£8 000 (PTB)
£15 000 (PTB )
£17,200 pro rata (to include recruitment costs)
£3,044 (PTB)
£10,000 (PTB) |
|
Total cost Box 10: |
£149,404 |
|||
Grid costings
|
Social services |
police |
BSC |
Health m/s |
Pooled Treatment Budget |
total |
|
|
Grid 1 |
1,500 |
4000 |
5,500 |
|||
|
Grid 2 |
47,641 |
9,540 |
31,857 ars 70,826 cjip |
8,700 |
159,794 |
328,358 |
|
Grid 3 |
138,705 |
95,662 BSC dat/cad |
268,333 |
252,624 |
755,324 + 150,000 c/f 905,324 |
|
|
Grid 4 |
95,820 |
105,417 |
10,000 |
211,237 |
||
|
Grid 5 |
- |
|||||
|
Grid 6 |
8,790 |
8,790 |
||||
|
Grid 7 |
400 |
86,844 |
87,244 |
|||
|
Grid 8 |
||||||
|
TOTAL |
282,566 |
11,040 |
198,345 |
382,450 |
522,052 |
1,546,453 |
|
Grid 9 (priority spend to be deducted) |
149,404 |
149,404
|
||||
|
SubTotal |
£1,397,049 |
|||||
|
Unallocated PTB |
37,352 |
|||||
|
TOTAL SPEND FOR 04/05 |
£1,434,401 |
|||||
|
Total PTB spend |
372,648 |
|||||
|
Priorities to be agreed for reinstatement to the value of: |
|
37,352 |
NB The figures shown in blue and marked ‘2003’ in Grids 1-8 show new ‘in year’ projects not included in the 2003 Treatment Plan which have been funded in 2003/04 and therefore not included in the spend for 2004/05 as set out in this Plan. They have been included to provide a clear indication of services in place/[planned for this financial year.